Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41019775›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2025

Enhancing weed detection through knowledge distillation and attention mechanism.

Ali El Alaoui, Hajar Mousannif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ali El AlaouiComputer Science Department, Computer Systems Engineering Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences Semlalia Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakesh, Morocco.
Hajar MousannifComputer Science Department, Computer Systems Engineering Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences Semlalia Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakesh, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weeds pose a significant challenge in agriculture by competing with crops for essential resources, leading to reduced yields. To address this issue, researchers have increasingly adopted advanced machine learning techniques. Recently, Vision Transformers (ViT) have demonstrated remarkable success in various computer vision tasks, making their application to weed classification, detection, and segmentation more advantageous compared to traditional Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) due to their self-attention mechanism. However, the deployment of these models in agricultural robotics is hindered by resource limitations. Key challenges include high training costs, the absence of inductive biases, the extensive volume of data required for training, model size, and runtime memory constraints. This study proposes a knowledge distillation-based method for optimizing the ViT model. The approach aims to enhance the ViT model architecture while maintaining its performance for weed detection. To facilitate the training of the compacted ViT student model and enable parameter sharing and local receptive fields, knowledge was distilled from ResNet-50, which serves as the teacher model. Experimental results demonstrate significant enhancements and improvements in the student model, achieving a mean Average Precision (mAP) of 83.47%. Additionally, the model exhibits minimal computational expense, with only 5.7 million parameters. The proposed knowledge distillation framework successfully addresses the computational constraints associated with ViT deployment in agricultural robotics while preserving detection accuracy for weed detection applications.

Indexed as

deep learningprecision agriculturerobotic weed controlvision transformerweed detection

Identifiers

PMID41019775
PMCPMC12460097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.