ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Deep-broad learning network model for precision identification and diagnosis of grape leaf diseases.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Grading for grapevine downy mildew and feature extraction methods for predicting abaxial lesions from adaxial leaf images.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper addresses the problem of rapid, precise, and efficient identification and diagnosis of grape leaf diseases by proposing the Deep-Broad Learning Network Model (ABLSS), which combines a Broad Learning network model with deep learning techniques. The model is optimized using the Adam algorithm based on BLS, and incorporates the LTM mechanism, which significantly enhances learning efficiency, stability, and recognition accuracy. Additionally, by integrating deep learning network optimization techniques, a SENet attention mechanism is added between the mapping and enhancement layers of BLS. Furthermore, based on the U-Net segmentation model, the method integrates dilated spatial pyramid pooling and feature pyramid networks. Dilated convolutions with varying dilation rates are used to capture multi-scale contextual information, which providing rich semantic information and high-resolution details during the decoding process. This improves the ABLSS model's ability to identify small disease spots. Experimental results show that the ABLSS model achieves the highest recognition accuracy for three types of diseases with similar features on grape leaves, with an average accuracy improvement of 7.69% over BLS and 4.48% over deep learning networks. The MIOU of the segmentation model reaches 86.61%, which is a 6.48% improvement over the original U-Net model, and the MPA is 90.23%, a 8.09% improvement over the original U-Net. These results demonstrate that the proposed method significantly improves the algorithm's recognition accuracy for small and irregular complex images. The ABLSS model recognizes images 0.375 seconds faster than the deep learning network, achieving a 72.12% speed improvement, thereby significantly enhancing the recognition efficiency of fine features. The ABLSS model combines the high recognition accuracy of deep learning with the fast processing speed of Broad Learning, while overcoming the limitations of BLS in recognizing complex images. This study provides valuable support for the development of smart orchard technologies and the optimization of learning network models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.