ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
IMNM: integrated multi-network model for identifying pepper leaf diseases.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a vegetable crop with high economic value, the yield of pepper is often significantly restricted by leaf diseases, and the spots formed by these diseases on the surface of leaves are highly complex in color and texture characteristics. To overcome the shortcomings of traditional manual identification methods, such as low efficiency, time-consuming, and labor-consuming, an integrated multi-network model (IMNM) was established by combining an improved ResNet, a dynamic convolution network (DCN), and a progressive prototype network (PPN), which was aimed at five typical pepper leaf samples (healthy, virus, leaf blight, brown spot, and phyllosticta). The experimental results show that IMNM achieves 98.55% accuracy in pepper disease identification, which is significantly better than the benchmark models such as Inception-V4, ShuffleNet-V3, and EfficientNet-B7. In the cross-species generalization verification, the average identification accuracy of the model for apple, wheat, and rice leaf diseases increased to 99.81%, and its four core indicators of specificity, precision, sensitivity, and accuracy were all stable over 98%. This demonstrates that IMNM can effectively analyze the color and texture characteristics of highly heterogeneous disease spots and possesses strong cross-crop generalization capabilities. Its technical path lays a theoretical foundation for the development of field mobile disease diagnosis equipment based on deep learning, and is of great value for promoting the engineering application of an intelligent monitoring system for crop diseases and insect pests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.