ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Apple leaf disease image recognition based on a modified rime optimization algorithm and ConvNeXt network.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early and accurate diagnosis of apple leaf disease is a prerequisite for maintaining crop health and for enhancing agricultural productivity. Conventional methods, which largely relied on human inspection or naive machine learning algorithms, were not capable of handling the complexity of patterns, the class imbalance, and the real-world challenges such as conflated symptoms or poor lighting. The present study develops a completely new model design by integrating a ConvNeXt model along with a modified rime optimization algorithm (MRIME) used for hyperparameter tuning as well as complementing through the Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM) to ensure better feature extraction. CBAM extends the power of the model in focusing on critical discriminative regions, while MRIME gives optimal values for relevant hyperparameters for generalization while avoiding overfitting. Evaluated by the Apple Leaf Disease Symptoms Dataset, the proposed approach attained an accuracy of 92.7%, precision of 92.5%, recall of 92.6%, F1-score of 92.5%, and mAP of 92.3%, surpassing most baselines including ResNet50 and EfficientNet-B0. Compared to the aforementioned baselines, ablation experiments demonstrated that CBAM led to about 1.5% enhancement in accuracy, while MRIME could boost performance by another 1.2% via hyperparameter tuning. These results confirm the complementary benefit of attention mechanisms and metaheuristic optimization in producing state-of-the-art results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.