ArticlePreventive medicine reports2025
Inequalities in breast cancer incidence and mortality in women with and without disabilities in South Korea: A population-based cohort study.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Breast cancer burden among women of reproductive age in China, Japan, and South Korea, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Women with disabilities often face functional limitations and comorbidities that increase cancer risk. This study investigated breast cancer incidence and mortality among women with and without disabilities in South Korea. Methods: We analyzed 2.87 million cancer-free women aged ≥30 who participated in the 2002-2003 national health screening program, linking the National Health Insurance Database, Cancer Registry, and cause-of-death records (2003-2019). Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), standardized mortality ratios (SMRs), and mortality-to-incidence (M/I) ratios were calculated by disability status. Cox proportional hazards models with piecewise follow-up estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for breast cancer outcomes. Results: Among 296,689 women with disabilities, 3579 developed breast cancer and 465 died from it; among 2.58 million without disabilities, 46,267 developed it and 3779 died. Women with disabilities had lower incidence (SIR ratio 0.86, 95 % CI 0.83, 0.90) but comparable breast cancer-specific mortality (SMR ratio 1.00, 95 % CI 0.89, 1.13). Cox models showed consistently lower aHRs for breast cancer incidence and mortality early on, but aHRs for all-cause mortality increased over time. Conclusions: Despite lower incidence, women with disabilities experienced similar breast cancer-specific mortality and higher long-term all-cause mortality. These findings underscore persistent inequalities and highlight the need for timely, equitable cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.