ArticleDIS. Designing Interactive Systems (Conference)2025
Toward Patient-Centered AI Fact Labels: Leveraging Extrinsic Trust Cues.
Article in DIS. Designing Interactive Systems (Conference), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Key Information Influencing Patient Decision-Making About AI in Health Care: Survey Experiment Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Facts label for transparent communication of AI Risks in mental health technology.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
AI technologies in healthcare hold great promise for addressing numerous challenges, but ensuring that patients understand, trust, and adopt these technologies remains a significant hurdle. While the HCI community has proposed AI documentation frameworks (e.g., model cards) to enhance understanding, patient perspectives in the healthcare AI documentation remain underexplored. To address this gap, we designed prototypes based on existing frameworks and gathered feedback from 18 participants to explore their perspectives on AI documentation in cardiology, a domain where high-stakes AI tools are increasingly used and understanding users' trust in AI is essential. Our findings revealed patient needs for more detailed information about healthcare AI technologies, the importance of extrinsic trust cues (e.g., regulatory status), and the integration of AI documentation into existing care processes. Based on these findings, we discuss two design implications: enhancing patient-centeredness in AI documentation and leveraging extrinsic trust cues to improve its design. This study contributes to the HCI community by amplifying the patient voice in designing AI documentation and offering actionable insights into leveraging extrinsic trust cues effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.