Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41019582›Full record

ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2025

Prospective Multicenter Registry to Investigate the Clinical Feasibility of Combination Workflow With 90 W/4 s and Ablation Index-Guided 50 W Ablation (PRECISE-COMBO 90 W/50 W Study).

Yuji Saito, Ryuta Watanabe, Koichi Nagashima, Yuji Wakamatsu, Shu Hirata, Moyuru Hirata, Masaomi Kimura, Junjiroh Koyama, Hideharu Okamatsu, Yuki Komatsu and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Yuji SaitoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Nihon University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3916-4033
Ryuta WatanabeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Nihon University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2664-7139
Koichi NagashimaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Nihon University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2326-225X
Yuji WakamatsuDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Nihon University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1540-8514
Shu HirataDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Nihon University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0226-466X
Moyuru HirataDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Nihon University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2701-486X
Masaomi KimuraDepartment of Advanced Management of Cardiac Arrhythmias Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine Hirosaki Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0229-0569
Junjiroh KoyamaCardiology, Cardiovascular Center Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital Kumamoto Japan.
Hideharu OkamatsuCardiology, Cardiovascular Center Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital Kumamoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8122-3561
Yuki KomatsuDepartment of Cardiology Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba Ibaraki Japan.
Kenichi HiroshimaDepartment of Cardiology Kokura Memorial Hospital Fukuoka Japan.
Kaoru TannoDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center Showa Medical University Koto Toyosu Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Takahiro FuruyaDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center Showa Medical University Koto Toyosu Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Naoki AizawaDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center Showa Medical University Koto Toyosu Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Yuichiro SakamotoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Toyohashi Heart Center Aichi Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9611-2497
Taishi KuwaharaDepartment of Cardiology Tokyo Heart Rhythm Clinic Tokyo Japan.
Toshio MakitaDepartment of Cardiology Tokyo Heart Rhythm Clinic Tokyo Japan.
Kenta TakahashiDepartment of Cardiology Tokyo Heart Rhythm Clinic Tokyo Japan.
Shiro NakaharaDepartment of Cardiology Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center Saitama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6388-4398
Hirotsugu SatoDepartment of Cardiology Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center Saitama Japan.
Hideyuki AokiDepartment of Cardiology Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center Saitama Japan.
Masahide HaradaDepartment of Cardiology Fujita Health University Toyoake Aichi Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2345-9557
Yuji MotoikeDepartment of Cardiology Fujita Health University Toyoake Aichi Japan.
Jin TeranishiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Japanese Red Cross Society Himeji Hospital Hyogo Japan.
Shin TakaharaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Japanese Red Cross Society Himeji Hospital Hyogo Japan.
Kenta MurotaniSchool of Medical Technology Kurume University Fukuoka Japan.
Yasuo OkumuraDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Nihon University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2960-4241

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: High-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation is an established therapy for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation (AF), aiming to form efficient transmural lesions. Very HPSD (vHPSD) can further shorten ablation time but may increase the risk of acute PVI failure compared with HPSD. A combined HPSD and vHPSD strategy (90 W/50 W combination workflow) potentially balances efficiency and durability, though its clinical feasibility remains unknown. Therefore, this multicenter registry evaluated the acute and long-term efficacy of a 90 W/50 W combination workflow for PVI in patients with paroxysmal AF. Methods: In this prospective study, a total of 101 consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF underwent PVI using radiofrequency ablation with a 90 W/50 W combination workflow. We evaluated acute outcomes, including first-pass isolation and acute PV reconnection, and monitored atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrences over 12 months. Results: Median PVI procedure time was 35 min, with total procedure time at 105 min. First-pass PVI was achieved in 58.4% of patients, including 74.3% in the right PV and 72.3% in the left PV. Acute PV reconnection occurred in 31.7% (32/101). In multivariate analysis, carina sites independently predicted acute PVI failure in both HPSD and vHPSD groups, while contact force also predicted failure in the HPSD group. After 1 year, 89.9% of patients remained free from documented atrial tachyarrhythmias. Conclusion: The 90 W/50 W combination workflow did not notably shorten procedure time or enhance first-pass success. More standardized strategies, particularly in carina segments with higher contact force and ablation index under HPSD, may be required to ensure optimal lesion durability and favorable outcomes.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationcarina conduction gapcontact forcehigh‐power short‐durationpulmonary vein isolation

Identifiers

PMID41019582
PMCPMC12464861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.