Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41019518›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2025

Fear, loathing, and support for political violence in the United States: findings from a nationally representative survey.

Garen J Wintemute, Bradley Velasquez, Aaron B Shev, Elizabeth A Tomsich, Mona A Wright, Paul M Reeping, Sonia L Robinson, Daniel J Tancredi, Veronica A Pear

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Garen J WintemuteCenters for Violence Prevention, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Bradley VelasquezCenters for Violence Prevention, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Aaron B ShevCenters for Violence Prevention, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Elizabeth A TomsichCenters for Violence Prevention, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Mona A WrightCenters for Violence Prevention, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Paul M ReepingCenters for Violence Prevention, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Sonia L RobinsonCenters for Violence Prevention, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Daniel J TancrediCenters for Violence Prevention, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Veronica A PearCenters for Violence Prevention, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Racism, hostile sexism, homonegativity, transphobia, xenophobia, antisemitism, and Islamophobia increase risk for perpetration of interpersonal violence generally. We quantify their associations, singly and in combination, with support for and willingness to commit political violence in the United States, at a time of increased concern that such violence may become widespread. Methods: Findings are from Wave 2 of a nationally representative longitudinal survey, conducted May 18-June 8, 2023. Weighted prevalences of the characteristics under study are estimated from levels of agreement with abbreviated versions of previously validated scales, with missing values imputed using multiple imputation by chained equations. Associations with political violence are expressed as adjusted prevalence differences by level of agreement. Findings: The survey completion rate was 84.2%; there were 9385 respondents. After weighting, 50.7% (95% CI 49.4%-52.1%) of respondents were female; 62.7% (95% CI 61.2%-64.1%) were white, non-Hispanic; the weighted mean (SD) age was 48.5 (25.9) years. Prevalences of strong agreement ranged from 2.9% (95% CI 2.4%-3.4%) for antisemitism to 26.6% (95% CI 25.4%-27.8%) for homonegativity. In all cases, significantly higher percentages of persons in strong agreement than in non-agreement supported and were willing to commit political violence; the largest differences were for Islamophobia and hostile sexism. Less prevalent characteristics tended to have stronger associations with political violence. Associations were larger when characteristics were combined in a single measure. Interpretation: Racism, hostile sexism, homonegativity, transphobia, xenophobia, antisemitism, and Islamophobia were each strongly associated with support for and willingness to commit political violence in the United States. Such characteristics are resistant to change; prevention efforts should also seek to uncouple them from associated violent behaviors. Funding: Supported by grants from the Joyce Foundation, California Wellness Foundation, and Heising-Simons Foundation, and by the California Firearm Violence Research Center Violence Prevention Research Program, both at the University of California, Davis.

Indexed as

AntisemitismCivil warFirearm violenceHomonegativityHostile sexismIslamophobiaPolitical violenceRacismTransphobiaViolence and societyViolent extremismXenophobia

Identifiers

PMID41019518
PMCPMC12464958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.