ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2025
Clinical effectiveness of HPV vaccine by age at vaccination: a matched case-control study.
Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Association Between Human Papillomavirus Vaccination and the Risk of Cervical Cancer and Precancerous Lesions in Israel: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Important questions remain about the extent to which human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines are realizing their full potential in real-world settings. This study aimed to assess how age at the time of vaccination influences its effectiveness against HPV-attributable high-grade cervical lesions (HGCL). Methods: In this matched case-control study conducted in New Haven County, Connecticut, cases were vaccine-eligible women diagnosed with HGCL associated with HPV 16 or 18 from 1/1/2010 to 12/31/2019. Controls were women with normal Pap smear results, matched to cases by age, medical practice, and date of Pap test. Participants were interviewed and records were reviewed to ascertain vaccination history and possible confounders including sexual behaviors. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) by age at the time of vaccination was assessed using matched odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) derived from multivariable conditional logistic regression models. VE was calculated as (1 - OR) × 100%. Findings: A total of 524 women (132 cases and 392 controls) were included. The adjusted VE of >1 dose of HPV vaccine was 54% (95% CI: 8-77%, p = 0·03). When the first dose was given at ≤18 years of age VE was 75% (95% CI: 13-93%, p = 0·03), and when vaccinated >18 years VE was 43% (95% CI: -22 to 74%, p = 0·15). Interpretation: These data demonstrate that the full benefit of HPV vaccines may not be realized when administered at older ages. Continued and strengthened efforts should be made to ensure that recommendations for HPV vaccination of younger adolescents are followed. Funding: National Institutes of Health, American Cancer Society, Robert E. Leet and Clara Guthrie Patterson Trust, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.