Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41019487›Full record

ArticleAnnals of LGBTQ public and population health2023

The Health of Transmasculine Patients Compared With Cisgender Patients Treated With Hysterectomy in the U.S. South, 2014-2017.

Theo G Beltran, Tonia Poteat, Joacy G Mathias, Kemi M Doll, Derrick D Matthews, Whitney R Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of LGBTQ public and population health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Theo G BeltranDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Tonia PoteatDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Joacy G MathiasDivision of Women's Community and Population Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, North Carolina, USA; Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, North Carolina, USA; Duke-UNC Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, North Carolina, USA.
Kemi M DollDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Washington, USA.
Derrick D MatthewsDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Whitney R RobinsonDivision of Women's Community and Population Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, North Carolina, USA; Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, North Carolina, USA; Duke-UNC Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Re-Entry Supplement: Investigation of Oral Microbial Enzymes for the Detection and Treatment of Periodontal DiseaseUL1TR002489 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, SHAHEEN, NICHOLAS J · 2018 to 2022
$48.6M
North Carolina Translational & Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)UL1TR001111 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, CAREY, TIMOTHY S · 2013 to 2017
$43.9M
Multilevel Forms of Structural Racism and Racial Inequalities in ADRD RiskR01AG077947 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TAYLOR HARGROVE, Chantel L. Martin · 2022 to 2026
$3.5M
Racial Differences in Treatment with Hysterectomy: a Multilevel InvestigationR01MD011680 · NIMHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROBINSON, WHITNEY RAGAN · 2017 to 2021
$3.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001111NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002489NIA NIH HHS R01 AG077947NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD011680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper describes the clinical, reproductive, sociodemographic, and health care setting characteristics of a diverse transmasculine patient population compared to cisgender patients among a cohort treated with hysterectomy in a large health care system in the United States (US) South from 2014 to 2017. Additionally, we compare a computational phenotype (CP) for identifying transmasculine patients against a self-reported gender identity variable from the electronic health record (EHR). CPs are algorithms of medical codes and provider notes used to identify sub-populations not otherwise well-specified in EHR data. Without accurate identification of transgender patients, researchers are unable to fully address health issues in transgender populations. A CP for identifying transmasculine patients was generated using manual abstraction of provider notes, diagnostic codes, and prescription data. The CP identified 35 transmasculine hysterectomy patients compared to 1,822 cisgender women treated with hysterectomy for non-cancerous conditions. The 2017 EHR gender variable identified only 16 (45.7%) of the 35 patients from our CP method as transmasculine. Transmasculine patients (n=35) were younger and had higher reports of chronic pelvic pain than cisgender patients (n=1,822). Transmasculine patients were all treated in academic medical centers while cisgender patients were mostly treated at community hospitals. We found that an algorithm of diagnosis codes, keyword text-strings and testosterone prescriptions identified more transmasculine patients treated with hysterectomy than the self-reported gender identity variable.

Indexed as

African American/Blackbig datacomputational phenotypeelectronic health recordgender-affirming caregender identityhysterectomyprivate insurancepublic insurancetransgendertransmasculineuninsured

Identifiers

PMID41019487
PMCPMC12463398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.