ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025
Onlay Fixation With an All-Suture Anchor Provides Sufficient Biomechanical Stability for Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Femoral Fixation Techniques for Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Proposed Collision-Aware Planning Framework.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spiked ligament staples (SLSs) and biocomposite suture anchors (BSAs) are commonly used onlay fixation devices for modified Lemaire lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET). However, hardware prominence, tunnel penetration, footprint size, and irritation are documented issues. Knotless all-suture anchors (ASAs) are a promising alternative that mitigates these issues. Purpose: To compare the biomechanical behavior of LET using ASAs with SLSs and BSAs under simulated anterolateral forces. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Human iliotibial band grafts were harvested, whipstitched, and fixed onto fresh-frozen porcine femurs using ASAs, SLSs, or BSAs (n = 6/group). Each femur was placed in a custom fixture at the base of an electromechanical testing machine, oriented at 60° with iliotibial band grafts parallel to the load axis. Cyclic loading and load-to-failure testing were performed. Five millimeters of displacement was determined as the critical threshold for failure and survivorship analysis. Biomechanical outcomes included cyclic displacement, survivorship, and ultimate load. Results: Cyclic displacement values after all load ranges were 4.25 ± 0.28 mm, 3.94 ± 0.71 mm, and 8.14 ± 1.68 mm for ASA, SLS, and BSA, respectively. No significant differences in cyclic displacement were found between ASA and SLS, whereas significant differences were found in each load range between BSA and both ASA and SLS ( Conclusion: ASA onlay fixation for LET demonstrated comparable displacement to SLS and significantly lower displacement to BSA with greater survival during cyclic loading. ASA had comparable failure loading, with all groups exceeding the native anterolateral ligament failure load requirements. Therefore, ASA is a biomechanically viable alternative to SLS and BSA for iliotibial band fixation during LET. Clinical Relevance: ASAs are a biomechanically viable alternative to spiked staples and biocomposite suture anchors for LET onlay fixation, potentially mitigating complications associated with conventional techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.