ArticleNature machine intelligence2025
Error-controlled non-additive interaction discovery in machine learning models.
Article in Nature machine intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of clinical phenotypes and development of a predictive model for rapid lung function decline in COPD patients.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Robust and Interpretable Metagenomic Modeling Through Structure-Aware Multi-View Learning and Attribution-Guided Biological Insight.Research square · 2026Article
- Toward generalizable and interpretable AI in regulatory genomics.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) models are powerful tools for detecting complex patterns, yet their 'black-box' nature limits their interpretability, hindering their use in critical domains like healthcare and finance. Interpretable ML methods aim to explain how features influence model predictions but often focus on univariate feature importance, overlooking complex feature interactions. Although recent efforts extend interpretability to feature interactions, existing approaches struggle with robustness and error control, especially under data perturbations. In this study, we introduce Diamond, a method for trustworthy feature interaction discovery. Diamond uniquely integrates the model-X knockoffs framework to control the false discovery rate, ensuring a low proportion of falsely detected interactions. Diamond includes a non-additivity distillation procedure that refines existing interaction importance measures to isolate non-additive interaction effects and preserve false discovery rate control. This approach addresses the limitations of off-the-shelf interaction measures, which, when used naively, can lead to inaccurate discoveries. Diamond's applicability spans a broad class of ML models, including deep neural networks, transformers, tree-based models and factorization-based models. Empirical evaluations on both simulated and real datasets across various biomedical studies demonstrate its utility in enabling reliable data-driven scientific discoveries. Diamond represents a significant step forward in leveraging ML for scientific innovation and hypothesis generation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.