ArticleHand therapy2026
Strengthening capacity for basic hand therapy in South Africa: A consensus development conference and nominal group technique.
Article in Hand therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Access to hand therapy is a challenge in low to middle-income countries but is also restricted for many communities in high-income countries. As an essential part of the global rehabilitation community, hand therapists must consider how to extend access to basic hand therapy services and strengthen the capacity of the therapists who provide these services. This study aimed to identify capacity-strengthening strategies for generalist occupational therapists responsible for delivering hand therapy in the South African public health service. Methods: A consensus development methodology was employed. A hybrid consensus development conference was used to gather local and international evidence pertinent to the project's aim. A panel representing service users ( Results: The panel identified ten priority areas for action: supervision and support; resources; policy, leadership and governance; education and training; professional knowledge and skill; effective referral and care pathways; data and evidence for service improvement; professional attitudes, behaviours and dispositions; inter- and intra-disciplinary action and cohesion; and an intersectoral systems approach. Discussion: The priority areas were categorized and are discussed as strategic, educational, organizational, and operational priorities for strengthening the capacity of generalist occupational therapists to deliver quality hand therapy. We suggest ways that both local and global hand therapy communities can take action to position hand therapy as an essential part of universal health coverage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.