ArticleMultiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical
Validity and reliability of fatigue scale for motor and cognitive functions (FSMC) in an Iranian population of people with multiple sclerosis.
Article in Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a central nervous system disorder and is frequently associated with fatigue. The Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (FSMC) is an instrument to assess both motor and cognitive dimensions of fatigue in MS. Methods: The study included 60 MS patients who completed the Persian version of the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) and a translated version of FSMC questionnaire. The FSMC was translated using standardized forward-backward translation, expert review, and patient feedback to ensure linguistic and conceptual validity. To evaluate test-retest reliability, participants completed the translated version of FSMC again after two weeks. Content validity was examined by a panel of eight experts. Results: Sixty individuals with a mean age of 36.36 ± 9.7 years and an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 3.00 ± 2.0 were enrolled in this study. Fifty-one (85%) of the participants were female. The Persian FSMC demonstrated strong content validity (Content Validity Index: 0.875-1.00; content validity ratio: 0.75-1.00). Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach's alpha = 0.964). Test-retest reliability was strong for average scores (intraclass correlation coefficient (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.979), though fair to good for single measures (ICC = 0.540). Convergent validity was supported by strong correlations with MFIS scores (FSMC-total: Conclusions: The Persian version of the FSMC is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing fatigue in Iranian patients with MS. With strong psychometric properties, it is well-suited for clinical and research use in Persian-speaking populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.