ArticleIntensive care medicine. Paediatric and neonatal2025
Efficacy and safety of analgosedation with dexmedetomidine in critically ill mechanically ventilated children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Article in Intensive care medicine. Paediatric and neonatal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacological profiles and mechanism of action of remimazolam for ICU sedation.Journal of intensive care · 2026Review
- Sedative medications: a potentially modifiable risk factor for improving neurocognitive outcomes after critical illness in infants and children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Antibiotic-induced gut microbiota dysbiosis in the PICU: mechanisms, clinical outcomes, and management strategies - a narrative review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Dexmedetomidine is an increasingly popular analgosedative in critically ill children receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine compared to other analgosedatives in this population. Data sources: Seven electronic databases and trial registries to July 2024, without language restrictions. Study selection: Randomized controlled trials comparing dexmedetomidine to other analgosedatives in critically ill children receiving IMV. Data extraction and synthesis: Independently and in duplicate, we conducted data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and certainty assessment using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses, calculating pooled risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: We identified 12 trials ( Conclusions: Twelve trials evaluating dexmedetomidine have been conducted to date, with low or very low certainty for its impact upon delirium, withdrawal, and long-term outcomes. Future analgosedation trials require attention to intervention design, outcome selection and reporting to improve certainty in critical outcomes. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44253-025-00091-4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.