Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41019361›Full record

ArticleChronic stress (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)

Do People Seeking Care for Musculoskeletal Symptoms Experience Greater Agency and Better Experience Based on Written Information About Their Illness?

Emily H Jaarsma, Ali Azarpey, Drew Aronoff, David Ring, Amin Razi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chronic stress (Thousand Oaks, Calif.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily H JaarsmaThe Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1984-7151
Ali AzarpeyThe Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9915-6288
Drew AronoffThe Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
David RingThe Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6506-4879
Amin RaziThe Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1131-1758

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Current patient-facing health information may unintentionally reinforce unhelpful and less adaptive mindsets regarding musculoskeletal symptoms. This prospective randomized trial evaluated the impact of psychologically-informed educational material, explicitly designed to promote healthier interpretations of bodily sensations according to cognitive science principles, on patient experience when compared to standard professional society materials. Methods: In this trial, 133 adults presenting to an upper extremity specialist with one of eight common non-traumatic musculoskeletal conditions were randomly assigned to review health information produced by either: 1) a professional musculoskeletal society or 2) revised material created by the authors and psychologist collaborators. Participants completed surveys containing validated measures assessing personal health agency (PAM-13), perceived clinician empathy (JSPPPE) and emotional response to the material. Results: There were no significant differences based on the type of material reviewed. However, on multivariable analysis, participants diagnosed with rotator cuff tendinopathy, ganglion cyst, or carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome reported more negative emotional responses compared to those with lateral epicondylitis, regardless of the type of written material reviewed. Conclusions: Cognitively-informed musculoskeletal health information was acceptable to patients but did not yield measurable improvements in emotional response, agency, or perceived empathy when compared to standard material. During the visit, diagnosis-specific factors may influence patient reactions more than information framing. Practice Implications: Patients find clear, accessible material designed to cultivate the healthiest possible interpretation of bodily sensations acceptable and non-distressing. Future interventions should explore diagnosis-specific tailoring of information or repeated exposure to impact outcomes. Level of Evidence: II.

Indexed as

cognitive behavioral therapyhealth communicationhealth literacymusculoskeletal careorthopedic surgerypatient education

Identifiers

PMID41019361
PMCPMC12461074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.