Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41019301›Full record

ReviewSAGE open nursing

Admission Criteria for Undergraduate Nursing Programs: A Narrative Literature Review.

Eman Al-Awabdeh, Salam Bani Hani, Lisa Bayliss-Pratt, Mohannad Aljabery, Rasha Ibrahim, Abdelrahman Salameh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eman Al-AwabdehNursing Department, Fatima College of Health Sciences, Abu Dhabi, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9665-2668
Salam Bani HaniNursing Department, Irbid National University, Irbid, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0848-5615
Lisa Bayliss-PrattNursing Department, Fatima College of Health Sciences, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Mohannad AljaberyNursing Department, Fatima College of Health Sciences, Abu Dhabi, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5723-1534
Rasha IbrahimNursing Department, Fatima College of Health Sciences, Al Dhafra region, Madinat Zayed, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1066-3436
Abdelrahman SalamehNursing Department, Fatima College of Health Sciences, Abu Dhabi, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6175-7173

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Admission criteria for selecting the undergraduate nursing candidates have been a major concern in many countries over the past few decades. The quality of graduate nursing professionals appears to be associated with the effectiveness of undergraduate student selection processes. Aim: This literature review aimed to assess and summarize the existing research evidence regarding undergraduate nursing program admission criteria. Methods: Twenty-two eligible studies were selected for full review from PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, Scopus, ERIC, Medline, and CINAHL databases. Results: The following themes were identified using thematic analysis: grade point average, traditional interviews, and multiple mini-interviews as admission criteria. Studies on commonly used admission criteria, examining their effectiveness and limitations, were reviewed and analyzed. Conclusion: The continuous development of admission criteria for undergraduate nursing education has both opportunities and challenges. To choose the best applicants for nursing programs, a thorough evaluation was required by using a multifaceted selection process that equally considers caring values, academic ability, and overall potential. This can significantly contribute to the progress of the nursing profession and, more importantly, the safety and quality of care that patients and local communities will receive.

Indexed as

admission criterianursing programqualificationsundergraduate

Identifiers

PMID41019301
PMCPMC12475341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.