Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41019245›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of plastic surgery2025

Extraocular Muscle Trauma: Clinical Approach to Diagnosis and Surgical Management of Rectus Muscle Disruptions.

Cen-Hung Lin, Pi-Chieh Lin, Ching-Hua Hsieh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cen-Hung LinDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University and College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan.
Pi-Chieh LinDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University and College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan.
Ching-Hua HsiehDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University and College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to review the clinical approach to diagnos and surgical management of traumatic extraocular rectus muscle disruptions, a rare but significant cause of strabismus and diplopia in the adult trauma patients. This review examined the anatomy of the four rectus muscles, mechanisms of injury, clinical presentation, imaging evaluation, classification of injury types, management strategies, outcomes, and future directions in treatment. Extraocular rectus muscle disruptions occur through blunt trauma (typically causing muscle entrapment in the orbital fractures) or penetrating trauma (causing laceration or avulsion). Clinical features include diplopia, restricted eye movement, and in some cases, visible muscle prolapse. Imaging evaluation includes computed tomographyas first-line approach, with magnetic resonance imaging providing superior soft tissue detail, and anterior segment optical coherence tomography offering valuable information for surgical planning. Management focuses on early intervention, with surgical repair ideally performed within 24-48 hours for entrapped muscles and within days for lacerations or avulsions. Outcomes vary based on injury severity and timing of treatment, with better prognosis associated with early intervention. While traumatic extraocular rectus muscle disruptions present complex challenges, prompt diagnosis and surgical management often yield favorable results. Future advances in treatment might involve advanced imaging techniques, engineered tissue for muscle reconstruction, refined surgical approaches, and improved interdisciplinary trauma care protocols.

Indexed as

DiplopiaExtraocular musclesMuscle avulsionOrbital traumaStrabismus

Identifiers

PMID41019245
PMCPMC12476249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.