ArticleWorld journal of plastic surgery2025
Columella-Labial Angle Changes Following Septocolumellar Suture and Lateral Crural Overlay Methods in Rhinoplasty.
Article in World journal of plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: One of the most important stages in rhinoplasty is the control of nasal tip rotation. Different techniques have been proposed to achieve this goal. We aimed to compare the effects of two methods of Septocolumellar Suture (SCS) and Lateral Crural Overlay (LCO) on nasal tip rotation by measuring of Columella-Labial angle. Methods: In a single-blinded clinical trial, 148 patients were selected among the patients who were candidates for rhinoplasty in Sina Hospital in Tehran, Iran 2024. The patients were randomly divided into two groups (each group contained 74 subjects). The patients in the first group were operated on using LCO technique, and the patients in the second group were operated on using SCS technique. Columella-Labial angle of the samples were evaluated using the photographs of the samples before and six months after surgery. The obtained results were compared using SPSS software and t-paired and Mann-Whitney statistical tests. Results: The mean Columella-Labial angle in both groups was more than that before surgery (P<0.001). The mean Columella-Labial angle before surgery in the SCS group were higher than that in LCO group and this difference was significant (P<0.001). The Columella-Labial angle difference was also significant between the two groups after surgery (P = 0.005), and Columella-Labial angle in LCO group was higher than that in SCS group (P <0.001). Conclusion: LCO technique increase Columella-Labial angle more than SCS technique. Therefore, it is recommended that LCO technique to be used in patients with who need greater Columella-Labial angle change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.