Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41019216›Full record

ArticleArXiv2025

Development and in silico imaging trial evaluation of a deep-learning-based transmission-less attenuation compensation method for DaT SPECT.

Zitong Yu, Md Ashequr Rahman, Zekun Li, Chunwei Ying, Hongyu An, Tammie L S Benzinger, Richard Laforest, Jingqin Luo, Scott A Norris, Abhinav K Jha

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zitong Yu
Md Ashequr Rahman
Zekun Li
Chunwei Ying
Hongyu An
Tammie L S Benzinger
Richard Laforest
Jingqin Luo
Scott A Norris
Abhinav K Jha

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative measures of dopamine transporter (DaT) uptake in caudate, putamen, and globus pallidus derived from DaT-single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images are being investigated as biomarkers to diagnose, assess disease status, and track the progression of Parkinsonism. Reliable quantification from DaT-SPECT images requires performing attenuation compensation (AC), typically with a separate X-ray CT scan. Such CT-based AC (CTAC) has multiple challenges, a key one being the non-availability of X-ray CT component on many clinical SPECT systems. Even when a CT is available, the additional CT scan leads to increased radiation dose, costs, and complexity, potential quantification errors due to SPECT-CT misalignment, and higher training and regulatory requirements. To overcome the challenges with the requirement of a CT scan for AC in DaT SPECT, we propose a deep learning (DL)-based transmission-less AC method for DaT-SPECT (DaT-CTLESS). An in silico imaging trial, titled ISIT-DaT, was designed to evaluate the performance of DaT-CTLESS on the regional uptake quantification task. We observed that DaT-CTLESS yielded a significantly higher correlation with CTAC than that between UAC and CTAC on the regional DaT uptake quantification task. Further, DaT-CLTESS had an excellent agreement with CTAC on this task, significantly outperformed UAC in distinguishing patients with normal versus reduced putamen SBR, yielded good generalizability across two scanners, was generally insensitive to intra-regional uptake heterogeneity, demonstrated good repeatability, exhibited robust performance even as the size of the training data was reduced, and generally outperformed the other considered DL methods on the task of quantifying regional uptake across different training dataset sizes. These results provide a strong motivation for further clinical evaluation of DaT-CTLESS.

Identifiers

PMID41019216
PMCPMC12461814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.