ArticleThe British journal of occupational therapy2025
Exploring ableism and occupational therapy: perspectives of occupational therapy educators working within higher education.
Article in The British journal of occupational therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study examined the viewpoints of occupational therapy educators in higher education regarding ableism and its impact on occupational therapy practice. It forms part of a wider study which also explored occupational therapy student perspectives, published separately. Method: An online survey involved the administration of Likert-scales and open-ended survey questions, enabling a comprehensive examination of occupational therapy educators' perspectives on ableism in occupational therapy. Findings: The sample comprised 32 teaching staff actively engaged in occupational therapy degree-level education. Most participants (72%) perceived occupational therapy as inherently ableist. Content analysis showed variations in how respondents understood the term 'ableism', and this appeared to be a compounding factor in respondents' views as to whether the profession is ableist. Most (89%) respondents agreed that the profession focuses on independence, affirming past critiques. Themes, including cultural sensitivity, challenges with engaging in disability studies, and power dynamics within occupational therapy education, emerged. Conclusion/Impact: This study provides insight into educators' opinions of occupational therapy practices and their promotion of ableism. Future qualitative research should aim to unravel additional understanding of ableism within occupational therapy, including its origins, so future systemic changes required to address the harm of ableism can begin to be addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.