Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41019157›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of occupational therapy2025

Exploring ableism and occupational therapy: perspectives of occupational therapy educators working within higher education.

Hannah Darton, Alison Laver-Fawcett, Alison Wadey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of occupational therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hannah DartonTees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Trust, York, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8860-2177
Alison Laver-FawcettYork St John University, York, UK.
Alison WadeyYork St John University, York, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9924-1319

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: This study examined the viewpoints of occupational therapy educators in higher education regarding ableism and its impact on occupational therapy practice. It forms part of a wider study which also explored occupational therapy student perspectives, published separately. Method: An online survey involved the administration of Likert-scales and open-ended survey questions, enabling a comprehensive examination of occupational therapy educators' perspectives on ableism in occupational therapy. Findings: The sample comprised 32 teaching staff actively engaged in occupational therapy degree-level education. Most participants (72%) perceived occupational therapy as inherently ableist. Content analysis showed variations in how respondents understood the term 'ableism', and this appeared to be a compounding factor in respondents' views as to whether the profession is ableist. Most (89%) respondents agreed that the profession focuses on independence, affirming past critiques. Themes, including cultural sensitivity, challenges with engaging in disability studies, and power dynamics within occupational therapy education, emerged. Conclusion/Impact: This study provides insight into educators' opinions of occupational therapy practices and their promotion of ableism. Future qualitative research should aim to unravel additional understanding of ableism within occupational therapy, including its origins, so future systemic changes required to address the harm of ableism can begin to be addressed.

Indexed as

Ableismdisability studieseducatorsoccupational therapysurvey

Identifiers

PMID41019157
PMCPMC12461066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.