Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41019154›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025

Multifactorial Analysis of Postoperative Recurrence of Anal Fistula: A Retrospective Study.

Fang Fang, Luping Wen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fang FangDepartment of Anorectal Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Zhuhai, 519015, People's Republic of China.
Luping WenDepartment of Coloproctology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, 221005, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to investigate the main factors that influence the recurrence of anal fistulas in patients with perianal abscesses following incision and drainage treatment. Methods: A retrospective case-control study was performed according to the STROBE guidelines for patients with perianal abscesses who underwent surgical treatment at Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine in Zhuhai and at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University in Lasso between June 2021 and June 2023. Lasso and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to further determine the recurrence of perianal abscesses. Results: A total of 435 patients were included in the study, with a median follow-up period of 25 months (range 18-40 months) after receiving treatment for perianal abscesses. Of these patients, 27 were in the anal fistula group and 408 were in the cured group. The results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that a history of abscesses, enteritis, intraoperative pus cavity residue, standardized dressing changes after discharge, the surgeon's specialty, preoperative ultrasound or MRI examination, Parks classification and Wexner score were independently influential factors in the formation of anal fistulas after perianal abscess surgery ( Conclusion: A history of abscesses and enteritis, Parks classification, and intraoperative pus cavity residue are high-risk factors for anal fistula recurrence. Standardized dressing changes after discharge, a preoperative ultrasound or MRI scan, and a postoperative assessment of anal function (Wexner score) are important for protecting anal sphincter function and improving the prognosis of perianal abscesses.

Indexed as

anal fistulaperianal abscessrecurrencerisk factor

Identifiers

PMID41019154
PMCPMC12474735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.