ArticleJournal of hip preservation surgery2025
Arthroscopic-assisted core decompression for avascular necrosis of the femoral head demonstrates favorable clinical outcomes: a systematic review.
Article in Journal of hip preservation surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Precollapse femoral head avascular necrosis after combined surgical-medical management.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review aims to evaluate clinical outcomes for arthroscopic-assisted core decompression (AACD) for avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head. A literature search following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Nine studies were included, five comparing AACD with isolated core decompression (CD) and four evaluating outcomes of only AACD. A total of 358 patients (462 hips, 71.8% male) underwent AACD. In the five comparative studies, the AACD and isolated CD groups had 97.6% (72.2-100.0%) and 98.5% (81.0-100.0%) of hips with precollapse AVN, respectively. The modified Harris hip score, reported in five comparative studies, was significantly higher in the AACD group in four studies and not significantly different in one study. The visual analog scale pain score, reported in two comparative studies, was significantly lower in the AACD group in one study and not significantly different in the other study. The collapse rate ranged from 2.9% to 14.0% at a mean follow-up of 37.9 months in the AACD group and from 14.6% to 28.6% at a mean follow-up of 34.7 months in the isolated CD group, with all five comparative studies reporting significantly higher collapse rates in the isolated CD group. In the four AACD only studies, 42.9-100.0% of hips had precollapse AVN with the collapse rate ranging from 23.2% to 45.5% at a mean follow-up of 39.2 months. Patients undergoing AACD for treatment of AVN of the femoral head demonstrate excellent patient-reported outcomes and low rate of collapse and complications, with a possibility of superior outcomes compared to isolated CD.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.