SynthesisFrontiers in surgery2025
Association between hospital volume and outcomes in ovarian cancer: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hospital surgical volume has been proposed as a determinant of ovarian cancer (OC) outcomes, but findings remain inconsistent. Objective: To systematically assess the association between hospital volume and outcomes in OC patients. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted through January 2025. Fifteen observational studies involving over 100,000 OC patients were included and qualitatively synthesized. Results: Thirteen of fifteen studies demonstrated that treatment in high-volume hospitals was significantly associated with improved overall survival (OS). Reported benefits included a 5-year OS increase from 22.3% to 55.0%, and up to 3% OS gain per 20 additional surgeries per year. High-volume centers also showed lower perioperative and 90-day mortality (e.g., 0.9% vs. 2.5%), and reduced failure-to-rescue rates. Two studies reported longer progression-free survival (PFS) in high-volume settings. Surgical quality indicators-such as complete cytoreduction and lymphadenectomy-were consistently higher in high-volume hospitals. Despite slightly higher complication rates, these centers had shorter hospital stays and better complication management. Conclusions: Higher hospital surgical volume is associated with better survival, lower mortality, and superior surgical quality in OC patients. Centralization of OC care may optimize outcomes and should be considered in policy planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.