ReviewFrontiers in surgery2025
Research progress and clinical application of all-inside reconstruction techniques: narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Elite Athletes: A Narrative Review.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Comparison of clinical efficacy between all-inside technique and traditional technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction under knee arthroscopy.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
All-inside reconstruction is a popular technique for cruciate ligament reconstruction in recent years. Compared with traditional reconstruction techniques, all-inside reconstruction is primarily performed through minimally invasive arthroscopic procedures, involving the creation of separate half-tunnels at the femoral and tibial ends, followed by fixation of the graft using adjustable suspension devices to achieve anatomical ligament reconstruction. Current research primarily focuses on anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in the knee joint, demonstrating advantages such as reduced surgical trauma, bone preservation, decreased postoperative pain, and accelerated rehabilitation. Extensive clinical studies have shown that all-inside reconstruction achieves comparable mid- to short-term clinical outcomes to traditional techniques, with superior performance in certain functional metrics. Additionally, all-inside reconstruction is associated with lower complication rates, smaller incisions that better preserve tendons, and reduced postoperative pain and discomfort. However, the technique also has limitations, such as a steep learning curve, potential graft micromotion due to suspension fixation, and tunnel widening. Therefore, this review aims to comprehensively elaborate on the developmental history, principles, applications across various joints, perioperative management, postoperative rehabilitation, efficacy evaluation, and biomechanical research outcomes of all-inside reconstruction. It will also discuss the clinical advantages and limitations based on the latest clinical studies, as well as future directions for improvement and research prospects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.