Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41019127›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2025

Research progress and clinical application of all-inside reconstruction techniques: narrative review.

Yong Jiang, Dikun Qian, Qiming Lu, Yangbin Cao, Yi Ren, Jun Su

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yong JiangQiannan Prefecture Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Duyun, China.
Dikun QianQiannan Prefecture Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Duyun, China.
Qiming LuQiannan Prefecture Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Duyun, China.
Yangbin CaoQiannan Prefecture Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Duyun, China.
Yi RenQiannan Prefecture Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Duyun, China.
Jun SuQiannan Prefecture Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Duyun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All-inside reconstruction is a popular technique for cruciate ligament reconstruction in recent years. Compared with traditional reconstruction techniques, all-inside reconstruction is primarily performed through minimally invasive arthroscopic procedures, involving the creation of separate half-tunnels at the femoral and tibial ends, followed by fixation of the graft using adjustable suspension devices to achieve anatomical ligament reconstruction. Current research primarily focuses on anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in the knee joint, demonstrating advantages such as reduced surgical trauma, bone preservation, decreased postoperative pain, and accelerated rehabilitation. Extensive clinical studies have shown that all-inside reconstruction achieves comparable mid- to short-term clinical outcomes to traditional techniques, with superior performance in certain functional metrics. Additionally, all-inside reconstruction is associated with lower complication rates, smaller incisions that better preserve tendons, and reduced postoperative pain and discomfort. However, the technique also has limitations, such as a steep learning curve, potential graft micromotion due to suspension fixation, and tunnel widening. Therefore, this review aims to comprehensively elaborate on the developmental history, principles, applications across various joints, perioperative management, postoperative rehabilitation, efficacy evaluation, and biomechanical research outcomes of all-inside reconstruction. It will also discuss the clinical advantages and limitations based on the latest clinical studies, as well as future directions for improvement and research prospects.

Indexed as

ACLall-inside reconstructionclinical applicationlimitationsPCLperspectives

Identifiers

PMID41019127
PMCPMC12466215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.