Observational studyFrontiers in immunology2025
Isolated C3 hypocomplementemia as an early predictor of chronic kidney disease in lupus nephritis.
Observational study in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk of chronic kidney disease in newly diagnosed SLE with preserved renal function: a national study.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Glomerular Crescents in Adult Lupus Nephritis: Clinical and Pathological Insights From Saudi Arabia.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2026Article
- From immune dysregulation to renal injury: mechanistic insights and translational opportunities in immune-mediated nephropathies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Development and internal validation of a clinical nomogram for identifying lupus nephritis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Infectious Complications and Prognostic Factors of Mortality in Patients with Lupus Nephritis Admitted to Intensive Care Units.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
39 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The role of complement in the long-term renal survival of patients with lupus nephritis (LN) remains poorly understood. Recent studies suggest its potential impact; however, long-term data are lacking. Methods: This multicenter, observational, retrospective study aimed at investigating the influence of complement levels on long-term renal outcomes in LN patients. We evaluated whether isolated C3 hypocomplementemia (i-LowC3), defined as serum low C3 (≤80 mg/dL) and normal C4 (>10 mg/dL) six months after kidney biopsy is associated with subsequent risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD), End Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD) or death. Results: 445 patients with LN were studied (median follow-up 4.9 years). Based on six-month C3/C4 levels, patients were categorized into i-LowC3 (91 patients) and controls (354 patients). Over the first six months, serum C3 and C4 levels increased by a median of 20 mg/dL and 5 mg/dL, respectively. i-LowC3 was significantly associated with twice the risk of a poor outcome, including CKD, ESKD, composite outcome of CKD or death and ESKD or death, with lower survival rates for all these outcomes compared to controls (P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed a lower risk of CKD and CKD or death with increases in C3 levels during the first six months, while i-LowC3 was associated with an independent higher risk for these outcomes. Conclusion: The trajectory of serum C3 levels within the first six months appears to predict long-term renal prognosis of LN patients. These findings support the use of i-LowC3 as a low-cost, readily available biomarker to guide early treatment of LN patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.