ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2025
Percutaneous retrieval of a fractured coronary catheter: A case report.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intravascular angiographic catheter fracture is an extremely rare but critical complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Conventional retrieval strategies (e.g., surgical intervention, snares) may prolong procedures and raise peri-procedural complication risks. Herein, we report a case of successful retrieval of a fractured catheter using an innovative technique. Case presentation: A 59-year-old female with 7-year hypertension was admitted for 3-month recurrent exertional angina. Right radial coronary angiography was performed, during which a TIG catheter fractured ∼8 cm proximal to the ulnar-radial bifurcation in the right brachial artery. Initial attempts to retrieve it via a Runthrough NS guidewire failed.To retrieve the fragment, we sequentially advanced JR3.5, 6FBL3.0, and 6FJR3.5 guiding catheters via the right radial arterial sheath to the proximal stump, then tried advancing a Cross-IT XTR guidewire along them-this maneuver remained unsuccessful.Subsequently, an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retriever via the right radial sheath failed to snare the proximal stump. We then constructed a custom snare by looping a Runthrough NS guidewire at an extension catheter tip, and retrieved the fragment via balloon-assisted counter-traction.Postoperatively, the patient was stable without complications. Dual antiplatelet therapy and follow-up were initiated, with no adverse events at 1-month follow-up. Conclusion: This minimally invasive technique obviates surgery, shows promise for intravascular foreign body management, and provides insights for adapting to failed conventional strategies in complex cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.