ArticleClinical Medicine Insights. Oncology2025
Comparative Analysis of Primary and Second Primary Multiple Myeloma: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.
Article in Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With the increasing number of cancer survivors, second primary malignancies (SPMs) are attracting clinical interest. Although SPMs following multiple myeloma (MM) have been studied, data on second primary multiple myeloma (SPMM) remain limited. This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of SPMM with those of primary MM through a retrospective analysis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 183 patients with primary MM and 12 patients with SPMM treated at a single center between 2003 and 2022. To reduce selection bias, propensity score matching (1:3) was performed based on age, sex, year of MM diagnosis, and International Staging System stage. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: After matching, 48 patients (36 with primary MM and 12 with SPMM) were included in the final analysis. At the time of MM diagnosis, 83.3% of patients with SPMM had achieved complete remission of their primary malignancy. All but one received standard MM treatment. The median overall survival (OS) was 45.1 months for the primary MM group and 41.5 months for the SPMM group. There was no statistically significant difference in OS between the groups (hazard ratio: 0.72; 95% confidence interval: 0.33-1.56). Conclusions: Patients with SPMM, most of whom had well-controlled primary cancers, received active treatment and demonstrated clinical outcomes not significantly different from those with primary MM. These findings support the use of aggressive treatment strategies for SPMM. Larger prospective studies are warranted to establish optimal treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.