ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Antibiotic resistance ofOpen veterinary journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This cross-sectional observational study aimed to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of Methods: A total of 134 non-redundant isolates were obtained from oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs collected across multiple geographic regions. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted using the microdilution method, following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were determined for a panel of antibiotics relevant to both veterinary and human medicine. Resistance patterns were analyzed using statistical tools including hierarchical clustering, network graph analysis, decision tree modeling, and Monte Carlo simulation. Results: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains constituted 65.7% of the total, while extensive drug-resistant (XDR) and pan-drug-resistant (PDR) strains were found in 4.5% and 1.5% of isolates, respectively. The highest resistance rates were observed for neomycin (76.1%) and florfenicol (72.4%), whereas ceftriaxone and imipenem showed the lowest resistance rates (0.7% and 1.5%). Correlation analysis indicated notable associations between resistance to neomycin, doxycycline, and florfenicol, suggesting potential cross-resistance mechanisms. Monte Carlo simulation estimated an average MDR prevalence of 64.4% (95% CI: 50.0-77.6%). The high prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among pigeon-derived Conclusions: These findings highlight the need for enhanced AMR surveillance and responsible antibiotic stewardship in veterinary settings. Further molecular investigations are warranted to elucidate the genetic basis of resistance in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.