Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41018953›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2025

Benchmarking genetic interaction scoring methods for identifying synthetic lethality from combinatorial CRISPR screens.

Hamda Ajmal, Sutanu Nandi, Narod Kebabci, Colm J Ryan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hamda AjmalConway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, D04 V1W8, Ireland.
Sutanu NandiConway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, D04 V1W8, Ireland.
Narod KebabciConway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, D04 V1W8, Ireland.
Colm J RyanConway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, D04 V1W8, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2750-9854

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic lethality (SL) is an extreme form of negative genetic interaction, where simultaneous disruption of two non-essential genes causes cell death. SL can be exploited to develop cancer therapies that target tumour cells with specific mutations, potentially limiting toxicity. Pooled combinatorial CRISPR screens, where two genes are simultaneously perturbed and the resulting impacts on fitness estimated, are now widely used for the identification of SL targets in cancer. Various scoring methods have been developed to infer SL genetic interactions from these screens, but there has been no systematic comparison of these approaches. Here, we performed a comprehensive analysis of five scoring methods for SL detection using five combinatorial CRISPR datasets. We assessed the performance of each algorithm on each screen dataset using two different benchmarks of paralog SL. We find that no single method performs best across all screens but identify two methods that perform well across most datasets. Of these two scores, Gemini-Sensitive has an available R package that can be applied to most screen designs, making it a reasonable first choice.

Indexed as

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Cas SystemsEpistasis, GeneticSynthetic Lethal MutationsAlgorithmsBenchmarkingHumans

Identifiers

PMID41018953
PMCPMC12464814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.