ArticleTanaffos2024
Optimized Conservative Surgical Treatment of Pulmonary Hydatid Cyst: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.
Article in Tanaffos, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There are some controversies on surgical options for pulmonary hydatid cysts. We analyzed our experience in lung tissue preservation during the surgical treatment and optimal surgical options. Materials and Methods: This observational cohort analysis was conducted from July 2008 to July 2022. The Age, sex, clinical manifestation, recurrent rate, hospital length of stay, postoperative complications, and long-term results in each group were assessed. The American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status, Charlson Co-Morbidity Index (CCI), Complexity of surgery, and Clavien-Dindo score were also determined. Results: Out of 138 patients, 81case (53.5%) had intact cysts (G1), and the rest were infected cysts which in turn were subdivided into early infected (G2) and cavity suppurated=28 cases (18.4%) as (G3). Group G3 required special attention because the pericyst surface was severely inflamed, dirty, and had pus, so they were subdivided into 3 distinctive groups including G3a, undergone cystectomy, bronchial opening closure alone, G3b group, undergone cystectomy, capitonnage+bronchial opening closure and G3c group, in which pericystectomy also added to previously mentioned procedures. Major complications in the subgroups of G3a were 2 patients and G3b 3 patients, but in the subgroup of G3c, no considerable complications were seen. Cystectomy, closure of major bronchial opening, and capitonnage were done in intact, and early infected cysts. The results of both were the same, with no considerable major complication. Conclusion: Capitonnage significantly decreased the complication rate. The optimized approach in both G1 and G2 was: cystectomy, closure of major bronchial opening, and capitonnage. In G3, bronchial opening closure, pericystectomy, and capitonnage were the preferred procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41018934PMC12464839What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.