ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2025
Deep-learning-based estimation of left ventricle myocardial strain from echocardiograms with occlusion artifacts.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We present a deep-learning-based methodology for estimating deformation in 2D echocardiograms. The goal is to automatically estimate the longitudinal strain of the left ventricle (LV) walls in images affected by speckle noise and acoustic occlusions. Approach: The proposed methodology integrates algorithms for converting sparse to dense flow, a Res-UNet architecture for automatic myocardium segmentation, flow estimation using a global motion aggregation network, and the computation of longitudinal strain curves and the global longitudinal strain (GLS) index. The approach was evaluated using two echocardiographic datasets in apical four-chamber view, both modified with noise and acoustic shadows. The CAMUS dataset ( Results: Among the main performance metrics achieved are 98% [96 to 99] of correlation in the conversion from sparse to dense flow, a Dice index of Conclusions: The results demonstrate improvements over previously reported performances while maintaining stability in echocardiograms with acoustic shadows. This methodology could be useful in clinical practice for the analysis of echocardiograms with noise artifacts and acoustic occlusions. Our code and trained models are publicly available at https://github.com/ArBioIIMAS/echo-gma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.