Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41018891›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Stress management strategies and controlling emotion among Polish nurses and midwives who suffer COVID: cross-sectional study.

Barbara Zych, Anna Kremska, Anna Lewandowska, Małgorzata Nagórska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Barbara ZychInstitute of Health Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow University, Rzeszow, Poland.
Anna KremskaInstitute of Health Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow University, Rzeszow, Poland.
Anna LewandowskaInstitute of Healthcare, State School of Technology and Economics, Jaroslaw, Poland.
Małgorzata NagórskaInstitute of Medical Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow University, Rzeszow, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Stress management strategies and the ability of nursing staff to control their emotions is an important way to reduce emotional tension in a difficult situation. Aim: To identify the dominant stress management strategy and emotion control modality in professionally active nurses and midwives during the COVID-19 pandemic. Material and Methods: A total of 137 nursing personnel from south-eastern Poland were studied. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected with a questionnaire developed by the authors, stress management was assessed with the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS), and control of emotions was examined with the Courtauld Emotional Control Scale (CECS). Results: The most common strategy for stress management strategy among nursing staff was the task-oriented strategy, the least frequently used was the avoidance. Only the avoidance style showed a significant difference in the group of midwives taking the form of seeking social contact ( Conclusions: The tendency to prefer a maladaptive style of coping with stress and suppression of emotions in nursing staff is associated with the risk of psychosomatic diseases and occupational burnout. The results indicate the necessity of providing interprofessional support combined with learning to "actively cope" with stress at work.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalCOVID-19MidwiferyNurse MidwivesNursesOccupational StressStress, PsychologicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolandSARS-CoV-2EmotionsMidwivesNursesPandemicStress

Identifiers

PMID41018891
PMCPMC12462688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.