ArticleJournal of medical ultrasound
Incidentally Detected McCleery Syndrome during Handheld Breast Ultrasound.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The goal of our study is to identify the prevalence of McCleery syndrome and categorize its clinical manifestations in patients who obtained a diagnostic breast ultrasonography at our clinic. Methods: Five thousand four hundred and twenty cases were reviewed in our clinic for diagnostic breast imaging between May 2021 and May 2022. Five thousand three hundred and two of the cases were female, while 118 were male. Duplex Doppler scanning was used to assess the subclavian vein and the axillary venous structures. The same radiologist performed all examinations; in cases where suspicion was warranted, a second radiologist's opinion was acquired. The diagnosis was confirmed by consensus. Results: In 52 cases, McCleery syndrome was identified. Between the ages of 36 and 54 years, the average age was 47 years. In four of the patients, magnetic resonance venography supported the diagnosis. In most cases, McCleery syndrome was unilateral. In only two cases was it bilateral. The incidence of McCleery syndrome was 0.95% in our study. Pain was the most often reported symptom (53.8% of 28 cases). No symptoms were reported in 26.9% of the patients. Conclusion: During a breast ultrasound, radiologists should be aware of McCleery syndrome while assessing the axilla.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.