ArticleMedeniyet medical journal2025
Evaluation of Deaths in Malatya Due to the Earthquake Centered in Kahramanmaras on 6 February 2023.
Article in Medeniyet medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to retrospectively examine the cases of individuals who lost their lives as a result of the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes on February 6, 2023, and were brought to the study area designated by the Malatya Forensic Medicine Group Presidency. Methods: A total of 916 cases were referred for identification to the center designated as the study area by the Malatya Forensic Medicine Group Presidency following the earthquakes on February 6, 2023, and were examined retrospectively. The obtained data were coded and entered into IBM SPSS Version 22. Descriptive statistics and frequency tables were generated, and the data were analyzed. Results: Among the 916 cases included in the study, 477 (52.1%) were male and 439 (47.9%) were female; 23.2% were under the age of 18, and 13.8% were over the age of 65. The majority (87.9%) were citizens of the Republic of Türkiye. Most injuries were localized to the head and neck region (37.5%). Body integrity was preserved in 88.3% of cases, and signs of decomposition were observed in 77.1%. Fast Technology for the Analysis of Nucleic Acids blood samples was obtained in 39.5% of cases. All bodies were identified through a combination of primary and secondary identification methods and subsequently delivered to their relatives. Conclusions: In countries facing major disaster risks, forensic medicine units must always be prepared for such events. Postmortem examination and victim identification are multidisciplinary processes that require the coordinated efforts of experts from various fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.