ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
A comprehensive cross-sectional study on the current status of proactive health awareness among Guangxi healthcare workers and its influencing factors: understanding from both individual and variable viewpoints.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Enhancing awareness of proactive health concepts among healthcare professionals is vital in the context of an aging population and limited resources, shifting the focus from "patients and diseases" to "individuals and health." Methods: Using a self-developed Health Action Survey Questionnaire, this study assessed the proactive health cognition of randomly selected healthcare providers in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. Analyses included latent class models, binary logistic regression, and mediation effects. Results: Among 173,892 participants, 77,307 (44.46%) were unaware of proactive health. Significant differences in health behaviors cognition and willingness to disseminate health knowledge identified 4 groups among healthcare staff. Those with low health action cognition were more likely to know about proactive health, while those with high cognition and willingness had lower awareness. Health action cognition and willingness also indirectly influenced awareness through satisfaction with government health initiatives. Conclusion: Variations in health action cognition and willingness among Guangxi healthcare staff impact their awareness of proactive health. Relevant departments should prioritize healthcare workers who demonstrate both high awareness of the "Healthy China Action (2019-2030)" and the "Healthy Guangxi 2030" plan and a strong willingness to engage in health-science popularization, focusing on enhancing their satisfaction with government health initiatives to improve public-health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.