Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41018771›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Efficiency divergence and convergence in China's hospital sector: empirical insights from Guangdong Province using a multi-method approach.

Jianxin Yu, Yongyi Xu, Jindong Wu, Baoling Wu, Zijuan Zhang, Weizhang Huang, Hanxiang Gong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jianxin Yu *The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yongyi Xu *The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jindong WuThe First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Baoling WuThe Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zijuan ZhangStomatological Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Weizhang Huang *The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Hanxiang Gong *The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Since the launch of China's new round of healthcare system reforms in 2009, improving service efficiency has become a critical focus for enhancing the equitable allocation of medical resources and overall healthcare quality. Guangdong Province, as one of China's most economically dynamic regions, faces significant challenges in addressing disparities in hospital service efficiency and optimizing resource utilization. Objective: This study aims to comprehensively analyze the differences, dynamic evolution, and influencing factors of service efficiency among healthcare institutions in Guangdong Province. The goal is to provide scientific evidence for narrowing efficiency gaps between hospitals, enhancing overall service quality, and informing policy development. Methods: A comprehensive evaluation system for hospital service efficiency in Guangdong Province was constructed. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) was employed to measure efficiency levels. The Dagum Gini coefficient decomposition method was used to examine the sources of efficiency disparities among different hospital categories. Kernel density estimation was employed to investigate the dynamic distribution of service quality, while the Tobit regression model was used to identify key factors influencing healthcare service efficiency. Results: The findings indicate that significant differences in service efficiency existed among various categories of hospitals in Guangdong Province from 2018 to 2022. Specialty hospitals demonstrated the highest average overall efficiency, whereas general hospitals recorded the lowest efficiency and growth rates. The performance of healthcare institutions in terms of pure technical efficiency, scale efficiency, and overall efficiency showed fluctuations, but a general trend of recovery was observed. The Dagum Gini coefficient decomposition revealed a relatively high degree of internal efficiency inequality within general hospitals, peaking in 2021, reflecting heterogeneity in scale, management, and resource allocation. The Gini coefficient between specialty and general hospitals was also comparatively high. Kernel density estimation indicated a bimodal distribution in service efficiency, highlighting the heterogeneity of efficiency levels and an increase in hospital categories with lower service quality. The Tobit model analysis confirmed that a lower mortality rate among low-risk cases had a significant positive impact on service efficiency, while average appointment rate, the proportion of health technicians, and the proportion of senior health technicians had significant negative effects. Conclusion: It is recommended to deepen reforms of internal governance structures and enhance cross-level collaboration within healthcare institutions. Establishing efficiency-oriented mechanisms, optimizing human resource management, strengthening departmental collaboration, and leveraging information technology can effectively improve the service efficiency of healthcare institutions in Guangdong Province.

Indexed as

Efficiency, OrganizationalHospitalsChinaHealth Care ReformHumansQuality of Health CareGuangdong Provincehealthcare institutionsperformance evaluationservice efficiencytertiary public hospitals

Identifiers

PMID41018771
PMCPMC12460359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.