ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Addressing non-communicable disease management during disasters in the US Virgin Islands: a mixed methods study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Extreme weather events, like hurricanes Irma and Maria, have disproportionately impacted individuals with non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), exacerbating health disparities due to healthcare disruptions. The USVI and other Caribbean islands face increased morbidity and mortality from NCDs from rising risk factors and lack of improving in quality of care. This study explores the experiences of individuals with NCDs during these hurricanes to identify strategies for improving disaster preparedness and response. Methods: A mixed-methods cross-sectional study was conducted at a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in St. Thomas, USVI. One-hundred and thirteen quantitative surveys assessed preparedness, healthcare access, and mental health impacts. Fifteen semi-structured qualitative interviews provided deeper insights into patient experiences and coping strategies. Data integration followed a narrative approach. Results: Quantitative findings revealed nearly one third of participants struggled to manage their NCDs post-disaster, citing stress-related exacerbation of conditions (42.3%), lack of medication access (34.6%), and disrupted healthcare services (34.6%). Mental health burdens were significant, with nearly a third reporting anxiety (28%) and depression (27.8%), and 5.2% meeting PTSD criteria. Many participants (39.7%) had not received disaster preparedness information tailored to NCDs, with only 47.5% receiving guidance from healthcare providers. Qualitative interviews underscored these findings, highlighting that NCD management was deprioritized post-disaster due to immediate survival needs. Participants emphasized the role of family and community support in coping, yet also noted mental health stigma and limited healthcare access as ongoing barriers. Preferred communication strategies included social media, radio, and trusted sources. Conclusion: Findings reveal critical gaps in disaster preparedness for persons with NCDs in the USVI. Strengthening healthcare infrastructure, enhancing mental health support, and providing targeted education can improve resilience and reduce morbidity in future disasters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.