ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
A New Algorithm for Implant Choice in Aesthetic Breast Procedures Based on the Polytech Portfolio.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Next-Generation Approach to Subglandular Breast Augmentation Using B-Lite Implants: The Feather Touch Technique.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Aesthetic breast surgery remains among the most requested procedures in plastic surgery. Since their introduction, breast implants have significantly evolved in terms of composition, surface, and shape. Due to the wide variability in patient anatomy and expectations, no single implant type can universally address all clinical scenarios. Therefore, achieving the best outcome requires a tailored approach. Methods: This study presented a decision-making model developed by the first author (P.M.). The model aims to obtain fully personalized outcomes using the Polytech implant catalog, which offers an extensive range of different breast implant types (such as microtextured, polyurethane, smooth, and lightweight implants), allowing tailored solutions to meet individual patient needs. Results: The model is based on the "Akademikliniken method" by Hedén, a biodimensional method that promotes a nonvolumetric, proportion-oriented approach to breast augmentation. Supported by a comprehensive implant portfolio, it enables tailored surgical planning for primary augmentations, revision procedures, and combined procedures such as mastopexy. The structured algorithm guides surgeons in selecting the most appropriate implant based on individual clinical parameters. Conclusions: The decision-making model described provides a practical and adaptable framework to support surgeons in optimizing surgical outcomes. The breadth of the Polytech portfolio is key to delivering truly personalized outcomes: it not only enhances procedural precision by offering a wide range of tools and options, but also supports professional development through informed, case-specific choices.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.