Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41018735›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

Leveraging pre-trained embeddings in an ensemble machine learning approach for Arabic sentiment analysis.

Areej Jaber, Israa Bahati, Paloma Martínez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Areej JaberComputer Science Department, Palestine Technical University - Kadoorie, Tulkarm, Palestine.
Israa BahatiComputer Science Department, Palestine Technical University - Kadoorie, Tulkarm, Palestine.
Paloma MartínezComputer Science and Engineering Department, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganes, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Arabic sentiment analysis presents unique challenges due to the linguistic complexity of the language, including its wide range of dialects, orthographic ambiguity, and limited language resources. Addressing these issues is essential to develop robust sentiment classification systems. Methods: This study investigates the application of ensemble machine learning methods for Arabic sentiment analysis. Several homogeneous ensemble techniques are implemented and evaluated on two datasets: the balanced ArTwitter dataset and the highly imbalanced Syria_Tweets dataset. To mitigate class imbalance, the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) is employed. The models incorporate pre-trained word embeddings and unigram features. Results: Experimental results indicate that individual classifiers using pre-trained embeddings achieve strong performance; however, ensemble models consistently yield superior outcomes. On the ArTwitter dataset, the ensemble of Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine, and Decision Tree classifiers achieved an accuracy of 90.22% and an F1-score of 92.0%. On the Syria_Tweets dataset, an ensemble combining Stochastic Gradient Descent, k-Nearest Neighbors, and Random Forest attained 83.82% accuracy and an 83.86% F1-score. Discussion: The findings highlight the effectiveness of ensemble learning in enhancing the robustness and generalizability of Arabic sentiment analysis systems. Incorporating pre-trained embeddings further strengthens performance, demonstrating that ensemble-based approaches can overcome challenges posed by linguistic complexity and dataset imbalance in Arabic natural language processing tasks.

Indexed as

Arabic languageensemble learningmachine learningsentiment analysisSMOTE

Identifiers

PMID41018735
PMCPMC12460348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.