Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41018733›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

YOLOv10-based detection of melanocytic nevi: reverse exclusion optimization for melanoma screening.

ShengJie Wang, Jian Wang, Rui Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

ShengJie WangInternational Sakharov Environmental Institute, Belarusian State University, Minsk, Belarus.
Jian WangInternational Sakharov Environmental Institute, Belarusian State University, Minsk, Belarus.
Rui YinInternational Sakharov Environmental Institute, Belarusian State University, Minsk, Belarus.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant melanoma is the deadliest skin cancer, yet its early dermoscopic presentation closely mimics benign melanocytic nevi. Conventional visual or dermoscopic screening therefore suffers from high miss rates and generates excessive biopsies. In this study we focus on Chinese East-Asian patients and introduce a reversed-exclusion strategy-classifying "benign first, exclude malignancy": lesions that fully meet benign nevus criteria are deemed low-risk; all others are flagged as high-risk. Building on the real-time detector YOLOv10, we incorporate three medical-oriented upgrades: (i) a PP-LCNet backbone to preserve sub-3 mm textures; (ii) a Multiscale Contextual Attention (MCA) neck to enhance cross-scale aggregation; and (iii) a Shape-IoU loss that jointly optimises position, scale, and curvature. The model was trained on a multi-centre dermoscopic dataset from three tertiary hospitals in mainland China (2,040 benign nevi) and independently tested on 365 biopsy-proven melanomas collected at the same medical institution but drawn from a demographically distinct patient cohort, achieving a detection mAP@0.5 of 97.69% for benign lesions and a melanoma false-negative rate (FNR) of only 0.27%. By delivering high-confidence benign identification followed by malignant exclusion, the proposed model offers a high-precision, low-risk pathway for early melanoma screening in Chinese clinical settings. It can markedly reduce unnecessary biopsies while keeping the miss rate below the clinical safety ceiling of 0.5%, thus preserving the life-saving window afforded by early detection.

Indexed as

deep learningmelanocytic nevusmelanomareverse exclusionYOLOv10

Identifiers

PMID41018733
PMCPMC12464421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.