ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
The Proportion of
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of treatment-related serological changes in Treponema pallidum subsp. endemicum infection using latex-based immunoassays, with comparison to Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- The Potential for Combined Treponemal/Nontreponemal Rapid Point-of-Care Test and Treponema pallidum Polymerase Chain Reaction in the Diagnosis of Gestational and Congenital Syphilis in a Low-Resource, High-Prevalence Setting: Pilot Data From Malawi.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2026Article
- Implementation and Innovation in Syphilis Diagnostics: Insights from Global Health Systems, Molecular Testing, and Self-Testing Strategies.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2026Article
- Prevalence and correlates of active syphilis diagnosed using serological assays and the molecular research-use-only AptimaFrontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Technological innovations and breakthrough pathways in syphilis diagnosis: addressing global resurgence and the journey toward elimination.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Earlier syphilis detection is needed to reduce infectiousness and transmission and to improve control. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Methods: We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify studies of patients presenting with primary syphilis where Results: Of 2571 studies identified, 8 met inclusion criteria and were included. This contributed to 758 individuals with Conclusions:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.