Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41018584›Full record

ReviewACS omega2025

The Landscape of Wearable Sensors and Automated Literature Analysis with Large-Language Models.

Jaromir Klarák, Vitor H B D Santi, Luan F Moreira, Robert Andok, Maria Bardosova, Maria Cristina F Oliveira, Osvaldo N Oliveira

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jaromir KlarákInstitute of Informatics, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava 845 07, Slovak Republic.
Vitor H B D SantiSao Carlos Institute of Physics, University of Sao Paulo, São Carlos 13566-590, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0315-517X
Luan F MoreiraSao Carlos Institute of Physics, University of Sao Paulo, São Carlos 13566-590, Brazil.
Robert AndokInstitute of Informatics, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava 845 07, Slovak Republic.
Maria BardosovaInstitute of Informatics, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava 845 07, Slovak Republic.
Maria Cristina F OliveiraInstitute of Mathematical Sciences and Computing, University of Sao Paulo, São Carlos, Sao Paulo 13566-590, Brazil.
Osvaldo N OliveiraSao Carlos Institute of Physics, University of Sao Paulo, São Carlos 13566-590, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5399-5860

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid growth of scientific literature demands advanced methodologies to analyze and synthesize research trends efficiently. This paper explores the integration of complex network analysis and large language models (LLMs) to automate the generation of literature analyses, focusing on the field of wearable sensors for health monitoring. Using OpenAlex as a source of scientific papers in this field, paper citation networks were constructed and partitioned into thematic clusters, revealing key subtopics such as flexible graphene-based sensors, gait analysis, and machine learning applications. These clusters, characterized by their term importance and interconnectivity, served as input for LLMs (ChatGPT) to generate structured outlines and descriptive summaries. While LLMs produced coherent overviews, limitations emerged, including superficial analyses and inaccuracies in referenced literature. The study demonstrates the potential of combining network-based methodologies with LLMs to create scalable literature reviews, albeit with limitations to be addressed concerning depth and accuracy. The analyses highlight wearable sensors' transformative role in healthcare, driven by advancements in materials science, artificial intelligence, and device integration, while also identifying critical gaps such as standardization, biocompatibility, and energy efficiency. This hybrid approach offers a promising framework for accelerating scholarly synthesis, though today human oversight remains essential to ensure rigor and relevance.

Identifiers

PMID41018584
PMCPMC12461361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.