ReviewDiscover geoscience2025
A review of AI-driven Google Earth Engine applications in surface water monitoring, assessment, and management.
Review in Discover geoscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Web-Based Platform for Quantitative Assessment of Change Detection Using Rao's Q Index in Remote Multispectral Sensing Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Geospatial technologies now allow routine observation of lakes and wetlands across large areas, but turning those observations into timely, actionable insight still requires scalable computing. Google Earth Engine (GEE) provides a web-based platform that brings multi-sensor Remote Sensing (RS) archives and parallel processing together in one environment. This review synthesizes how artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have been paired with GEE to map and monitor surface water quantity and quality. We summarize recent methods, compare model families commonly used on GEE, and discuss frequent processing pitfalls. To ground the review, we include a case study of three Nebraska lakes (2022-2023) that demonstrates month-to-month tracking of water extent and indicators of water quality. The results demonstrated the effectiveness of GEE in providing timely and accurate insights for surface water monitoring and assessment while also revealing current limitations and opportunities for improvement. Overall, we find that coupling AI methods with GEE can strengthen operational surface water assessment and inform decision-making under increasing environmental pressures. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44288-025-00255-x.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.