ArticleDigital health
The challenges and opportunities of personal health data tracking and sharing amongst people living with HIV in the United Kingdom and their specialist healthcare providers.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: There has been an increase in digital tools and wearable devices that can be used by individuals to collect, track and share their personal health data (PHD). Collecting PHD could be particularly useful for those living with long-term conditions such as HIV. We explored attitudes to and experiences of tracking and sharing PHD in order to identify the challenges and opportunities within HIV care in the United Kingdom. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study comprising 24 semi-structured interviews with service users (SUs) (n = 10) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) (n = 14) between February and November 2020. Transcripts were analysed collaboratively using Thematic Analysis. Results: There was wide variation in the extent and types of PHD tracked and shared, and how this was done. Key themes included the use of PHD to enhance empowerment and self-knowledge about health, PHD enabling better clinical care, PHD impacting clinical consultations and SU-HCP relationships, the burden of PHD tracking, and privacy and data security concerns. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the opportunities and challenges of tracking and sharing PHD in the context of HIV, especially in view of increasing remote and digital clinical care throughout the National Health Service. Opportunities included enhanced autonomy and control over health and facilitating improved relationships and communication between SUs and HCPs. However, these opportunities must be considered in the context of constraints of service delivery and potential burden to SUs and HCPs, as well as key challenges regarding privacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.