ArticleDigital health
Maternal perinatal risk factors and full-term neonatal early-onset sepsis: A novel prediction model based on machine learning.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing artificial intelligence for pediatric health: Current trends and future opportunities.iScience · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS), occurring within 72 h of birth, is a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. The urgent need for rapid, accurate diagnosis is underscored by the condition's severity. Current diagnostic methods are hampered by non-specific clinical signs, leading to underdiagnosis or overtreatment. This highlights a crucial gap in neonatal care. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from 1613 full-term pregnant women at a single center in Shenzhen, China (2022), including 69 EOS cases. Ten machine learning algorithms (e.g. Logistic Regression, Random Forest, XGBoost) were developed using maternal prenatal predictors. Data preprocessing involved imputation, standardization, and Lasso feature selection. Models were evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation, and the SMOTE technique was applied to address class imbalance. Results: Among ten machine learning models, XGBoost and Random Forest demonstrated the highest discriminative ability (AUC=0.87). While a default threshold yielded low sensitivity, a threshold optimized for a clinical screening objective (0.04) achieved a sensitivity of 92.8% and a specificity of 73.1%. Key predictors identified included maternal temperature and inflammatory markers. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that machine learning models based on maternal factors have the potential to serve as high-sensitivity screening tools for EOS. Tuning the decision threshold is a critical step to maximize clinical utility, which involves a necessary trade-off between sensitivity and specificity. This approach provides a framework for developing and evaluating clinically-oriented prediction models to improve neonatal care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.