ArticleDigital health
Addressing pilotitis: A qualitative study on the implementation of eCoaches in hospital-based chronic care.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Health System- and Payer-Level Decision-Making Processes Influencing the Adoption and Sustainability of Patient-Facing Digital Health Tools: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Despite promising outcomes from pilot initiatives, the transition to widespread adoption and upscaling of eHealth solutions in the hospital context remains challenging. This study aims to explore the barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation of eCoaches from the perspective of professionals. Methods: A qualitative research design was employed, involving individual semi-structured interviews with management and healthcare professionals ( Results: Barriers and facilitators were identified across all CFIR domains: eCoach design and licensing costs (Intervention Characteristics); financial compensation (Outer Setting); integration into care pathways, Information and Communication Technology (ICT) infrastructure, team dynamics, and task reallocation (Inner Setting); intrinsic motivation, beliefs, and competencies of professionals (Characteristics of Individuals); patient resources and digital literacy (Patients' Needs and Resources); and availability of evidence and management information (Process of Implementation). Conclusion: This study underscores the complex nature of implementing eCoaches within the hospital setting, where barriers and facilitators span multiple interrelated domains. To overcome "pilotitis" and achieve the sustainable integration of blended care for patients with chronic conditions, comprehensive implementation strategies that concurrently address all relevant domains are essential. By illuminating the experiences of healthcare professionals, this study offers actionable insights to guide the design, implementation, and upscaling of eCoaches and related eHealth technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.