ArticleThe Neurohospitalist2026
Non-Mydriatic Ocular Fundus Imaging on Consecutive Neurologic and Neurosurgical Patients in an Emergency Department.
Article in The Neurohospitalist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Examination of the ocular fundus is part of the neurologic examination. However, bedside ophthalmoscopy is rarely performed, especially in emergency departments (EDs), with risk of delayed diagnoses and inappropriate triage. Our goal was to determine how often funduscopic examination using non-mydriatic ocular fundus photography combined with optical coherence tomography (NMPF-OCT) is possible and useful in a consecutive cohort of patients with neurologic/neurosurgical disorders evaluated in a general ED. Methods: This was a quality improvement project, prospective over 16 consecutive days/nights. NMFP-OCT was ordered for all patients presenting to our ED with any neurologic/neurosurgical disorders. Demographic information, neurologic diagnoses, presence of headache and NMFP-OCT findings were collected. Results: Over 1838 ED visits, 448 (24.4%) patients reported neurologic complaints, including headache, or a history of neurologic disorders, of which 246 (54.9%) received NMFP-OCT imaging. Papilledema was ruled out for 233/246 patients with images, and abnormal ocular fundus findings were found in 29/246 (11.8%) patients, 22/29 with acute neurological complaints, 3/29 with isolated headache, and 4/29 with a history of neurologic/neurosurgical disorders. Findings included papilledema (9), other optic disc edema (3), optic atrophy (11), retinopathies (4), and other (2). Conclusion: NMFP-OCT obtained in the ED in neurologic/neurosurgical patients allowed for rapid and reliable diagnosis of ocular fundus pathology in 11.8% of patients, confirming that NMFP-OCT is useful in patients with neurologic/neurosurgical disorders. However, 43% patients could not have NMFP-OCT, many due to illness severity, reinforcing the need for in-person funduscopic examination in some neurology/neurosurgery patients unable to have imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.