Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41018487›Full record

ArticleMedeniyet medical journal2025

Sex Estimation Using Patellar Morphometry: Evidence from a Late Roman Population in Anatolia.

Yarenkur Alkan, Adem Tokpinar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medeniyet medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yarenkur AlkanKırsehir Ahi Evran University Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Anthropology, Kırsehir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-8339-5655
Adem TokpinarOrdu University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Ordu, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-7661-9588

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Accurate sex estimation is a cornerstone in forensic and bioarchaeological investigations. While the pelvis and skull are traditionally used for this purpose, their absence due to taphonomic damage necessitates the use of alternative skeletal elements such as the patellar. This study evaluates the diagnostic potential of patellar morphometry for sex estimation in a Late Roman population. Methods: The study analyzed 146 adult patellar (70 males, 76 females) recovered from the Karlığın Tepesi Necropolis 3 Results: Statistically significant differences were found between males and females in PL (p=0.001), PW (p<0.001), and PT (p=0.003). The stepwise logistic regression model using PL and PT produced AUROC values of 0.906 in Step 1 and 0.920 in Step 2, with sensitivity and specificity ranging from 82.85% to 94.73%. All intraobserver reliability metrics (TEM, rTEM, R) indicated excellent measurement precision (R=1.000). Conclusions: Patellar morphometry demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy for sex estimation, particularly when multivariate models are applied. Despite the moderate discriminative power of patella thickness alone, its combination with other parameters enhances overall performance. The study provides the first population-specific discriminant model for sex estimation using the patella in an Anatolian archaeological sample. However, the skewed sex distribution and the possibility of post-depositional changes in ancient skeletal remains should be considered when interpreting results. Additionally, the population-specific nature of the archaeological sample and the lack of external validation on independent datasets limit the generalizability of the model to other contexts.

Indexed as

logistic regression modelsPatellaereceiver operating characteristicsex determination by skeletonsexual dimorphism

Identifiers

PMID41018487
PMCPMC12478640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.