Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41018480›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Utilising a Novel Virtual Reality System for Orthopaedic Pre-operative Trauma Planning.

Dominic Waugh, Rahul Bhattacharyya, Oliver Bailey, David Howie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dominic WaughTrauma and Orthopaedics, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, GBR.
Rahul BhattacharyyaTrauma and Orthopaedics, NHS Lanarkshire, Glasgow, GBR.
Oliver BaileyTrauma and Orthopaedics, NHS Lanarkshire, Glasgow, GBR.
David HowieTrauma and Orthopaedics, NHS Lanarkshire, Glasgow, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With increasing trauma burden, there is a need to improve the efficiency of care while improving surgical accuracy to minimise complications. Common fracture operations have been shown to have high failure rates, often related to implant-related technical errors. Pre-operative surgical planning has been shown to enhance orthopaedic surgical accuracy, particularly with robotic systems in elective arthroplasty. Historically, orthopaedic surgical planning was performed using plain radiographs, although modern three-dimensional (3D) techniques have been shown to be superior for assessing complex fracture patterns and are now in more routine use. While virtual reality (VR) environments have demonstrated benefits in delivering surgical training, there is little in the literature to describe surgeons' use of VR to visualise both patient-specific computed tomographic (CT) anatomy and surgical implants in the same virtual space. It was the author's aim to source and build an affordable system that would allow visualisation of 3D patient-specific CT data with the additional ability to augment this model with surgical implants, facilitating a full 3D trauma visualisation and planning system for complex trauma for surgical planning. Patient CT images were obtained as part of routine clinical care and viewed on local hospital patient imaging systems. An existing computer was upgraded with a graphics card to run additional software from Medicalholodeck™ (MedicalImaging XR™, Zurich, Switzerland). A VR gaming headset was purchased to utilise the system. A non-disclosure agreement was signed with our trauma implant supplier to allow access to virtual trauma implant object files. Patient-specific images can be opened on local computer software and imported to the Medicalholodeck™ MedicalImaging XR™ VR environment. Patient-specific images can be manipulated in 3D to review fracture patterns. Implant-specific files can be opened and placed within the same VR environment to plan optimal fixation. Local information technology (IT) governance procedures were followed during procurement, and patients agreed to the use of images in publication and research. To our knowledge, we are the first to describe this relatively low-cost, high-fidelity VR system using Medicalholodeck™ software, allowing visualisation of stereoscopic 3D patient images with specific orthopaedic surgical implants loaded into the same virtual space for orthopaedic trauma. We have been able to demonstrate proof of functionality in what we believe is a very useful tool to aid trauma and orthopaedic pre-operative surgical planning and execution going forward. In the future, we will look to demonstrate perceived usefulness by the orthopaedic team for fracture understanding and trauma planning. It is plausible that a VR system allowing accurate templating for orthopaedic trauma surgery could be of great benefit to both surgeon and patient and may have an influence over such factors as operative time, failure of fixation, surgeon satisfaction, and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

health tech innovationsorthopaedicplan evaluationtrauma imagingvirtual reality (vr)

Identifiers

PMID41018480
PMCPMC12476269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.